منابع مشابه
What Were They Thinking: Modeling Think Times for Performance Testing
When modeling users interacting with a system, the concept of think time will arise. Besides developing a workload model and recording scripts, a think time analysis is necessary in order to have an accurate test and appropriate system throughput. Think time is the time the user spends between tasks. Example tasks include: selecting from a menu, entering data into a text field, reviewing a list...
متن کاملExamining Students’ Intended Image on Facebook: “What Were They Thinking?!”
The present article examines factors that influence why students post information on their social network profile which employers would find inappropriate. Results show that many students make a conscious attempt to portray a particular image and, as predicted, their intended image was related to whether they posted inappropriate information. Those who believed they portrayed a hardworking imag...
متن کاملWhat Were They Thinking? Diagnostic Coding of Conceptual Errors in a Mathematics Learning Software Data Archive
Decades of research have demonstrated that students face critical conceptual challenges in learning mathematics. As new adaptive learning technologies become ubiquitous in education, they bring opportunities both to facilitate conceptual development in more focused ways and to gather data that may yield new insights into students’ learning processes. The present study analyzes data archives fro...
متن کاملWhat were they thinking? Cognitive states may influence [11C]raclopride binding potential in the striatum.
[(11)C]Raclopride ([(11)C]RAC) is a selective dopamine D(2)/D(3) antagonist that is commonly used in positron emission tomography (PET) studies to assess both basal levels of receptor availability and changes in availability caused by alterations in striatal dopamine concentration. When designing [(11)C]RAC studies, it is important to understand what variables may affect the results. Here, we e...
متن کاملWhat were They Thinking? Using Cognitive Interviewing to Examine the Validity of Self-Reported Epistemic Beliefs
We employed cognitive interviewing with a sample of secondary, college, undergraduate and graduate students to examine the cognitive validity of a popular epistemic beliefs self-report measure, the Discipline-Focused Epistemological Beliefs Questionnaire [DFEBQ] (Hofer, 2000). In addition, we examined cognitive validity across two domains. Analyses of interviews revealed that cognitive validity...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Neuroscience Letters
سال: 2008
ISSN: 0304-3940
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.10.017